RISC-V vs ARM: Which Architecture is Best for Budget IoT Devices?
2/19/2026 · IoT · 8 min

TL;DR
- RISC-V is an open-source ISA with growing support, offering cost-effective solutions for IoT.
- ARM dominates the market with mature tools, software, and support but can be costlier.
What is RISC-V?
- RISC-V is an open-source Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) designed for flexibility and customization.
- It allows companies to design their processors without licensing fees, making it an appealing choice for startups and cost-sensitive projects.
- Popular among academic institutions and open hardware enthusiasts for research and development.
What is ARM?
- ARM is a proprietary ISA known for its efficiency and broad adoption in mobile and IoT markets.
- ARM's mature ecosystem includes extensive software libraries, support tools, and a robust developer community.
- Licensed by semiconductor companies, ARM cores are found in the majority of IoT devices today.
Key Differences
1. **Cost**
- RISC-V: Free and open-source, enabling companies to reduce development costs by avoiding licensing fees.
- ARM: Requires licensing fees, which can increase costs for small-scale IoT projects.
2. **Customization**
- RISC-V: Highly customizable, allowing developers to optimize for specific use cases or energy efficiency.
- ARM: Offers pre-designed cores that are not as flexible but save development time.
3. **Ecosystem**
- RISC-V: Emerging ecosystem with growing support from companies like SiFive and Western Digital, but still lacks the extensive tools and software available for ARM.
- ARM: Decades-old ecosystem with mature development kits, debugging tools, and third-party support.
4. **Performance**
- RISC-V: Performance depends on the specific implementation, as it offers more flexibility for custom designs.
- ARM: Optimized for general-purpose use with proven high performance in a wide range of IoT applications.
5. **Community Support**
- RISC-V: Backed by an open-source community and organizations like the RISC-V International.
- ARM: Supported by a well-established developer base and corporate ecosystem.
Use Cases
RISC-V
- Startups looking to minimize costs.
- Experimental IoT projects requiring specific optimizations.
- Applications where open-source development and customization are priorities.
ARM
- Established IoT products with mass production requirements.
- Developers seeking robust tools and faster time-to-market.
- Projects requiring high compatibility and support.
Bottom Line
- Choose RISC-V for cost-sensitive projects where customization and innovation are key.
- Opt for ARM if you need a proven solution with robust support and a faster development cycle.
Found this helpful? Check our curated picks on the home page.