AtoZRanking

Two-Factor Authentication: Which 2FA Method Should You Use?

2/3/2026 · Security · 6 min

Two-Factor Authentication: Which 2FA Method Should You Use?

TL;DR

  • Use an authenticator app or hardware token when possible for the best balance of security and ease.
  • SMS is better than no 2FA but vulnerable to SIM swap and interception.
  • Push-based sign-in is user friendly and secure when paired with device attestation.
  • Keep backup codes or a secondary method stored securely in case you lose access.

Why 2FA Matters

  • Passwords alone are often compromised. 2FA adds a second proof that you are who you say you are.
  • The goal is to add a factor that an attacker cannot easily obtain along with the password.

Common 2FA Types

  • Authenticator apps (TOTP): Time-based one-time passwords generated on your device. No network needed.
  • Push notifications: Approve a sign-in attempt with a tap. Easier for users and can include device verification.
  • SMS codes: One-time codes sent by text. Widely supported but lower security.
  • Email codes: Similar to SMS, but depends on email account security.
  • Hardware tokens: Physical devices like FIDO keys that provide strong phishing-resistant authentication.
  • Biometrics: Fingerprint or face unlock tied to a specific device; good for convenience but often not usable as the only recovery method.

Security vs Usability

  • Highest security: Hardware tokens with FIDO2/WebAuthn. Phishing-resistant and strong.
  • Strong and usable: Authenticator apps and push sign-in.
  • Acceptable but weaker: SMS and email. Better than nothing, but vulnerable to interception.
  • Biometric prompts vary by platform and often act as a convenience layer rather than a remote second factor.

Authenticator Apps (TOTP)

  • Pros: Works offline, widely supported, portable if you export keys.
  • Cons: Can be lost if phone is lost; export/import can be awkward.
  • Popular options: Several apps support account export and backup. Use ones that let you create encrypted backups.

Push-Based 2FA

  • Pros: Very user friendly, often shows context like location or device. Can be more secure against phishing when implemented with attestation.
  • Cons: Requires network connectivity and vendor implementation. Some push flows can be abused if approvals are habitually granted.

SMS and Email Codes

  • Pros: Very easy and nearly universal.
  • Cons: Susceptible to SIM swap and interception. Treat as fallback, not primary, for high-value accounts.

Hardware Tokens (FIDO2)

  • Pros: Best protection against phishing and account takeover. No shared secret that can be phished.
  • Cons: Cost and the need to carry a device. Keep a backup key stored securely.

Recovery and Backup

  • Always save backup codes in a secure place like a password manager or a locked physical note.
  • Register a secondary 2FA method when offered, such as an authenticator app plus a hardware key.
  • For critical accounts, consider a trusted emergency contact or account recovery setup that is secure.

Which Should You Choose?

  • For most users: Use an authenticator app as primary and save backup codes. Add a hardware key for critical accounts like email and banking.
  • For convenience-minded users: Push sign-in paired with a strong password and backups is a good compromise.
  • If you must use SMS: Pair it with other protections and monitor for SIM swap alerts from your carrier.

Implementation Checklist

  • Enable 2FA on email and password manager first.
  • Use an authenticator app and export encrypted backups.
  • Add a hardware key for high-value accounts.
  • Store backup codes in a password manager and a secure physical backup.
  • Review recovery options and remove old phone numbers and obsolete methods.

Bottom Line

2FA drastically reduces account takeover risk. Prefer authenticator apps or hardware tokens when possible. Keep backups and a recovery plan to avoid lockouts while maintaining security.

Found this helpful? Check our curated picks on the home page.